Thursday, March 22, 2012

NRI CHILDREN CUSTODY ROW


Norway won’t hand over Indian kids

Oslo, March 22
Dealing a blow to an Indian couple battling for custody of their children, Norway's Child Welfare Service has said the kids cannot go back to India, where they can be caught up in "a very unfortunate tug of war" in the wake of differences between their parents.

"New developments in the child welfare case involving two Indian children make it impossible to carry out the hearing in Stavanger District Court that was scheduled for Friday 23 March," the Norwegian Child Welfare Service (CWS) said in a statement.

The statement follows reports of differences between the parents - Anurup and Sagarika Bhhtacharya, whose children three-year-old Abhigyan and one-year-old Aishwarya were placed in foster care in Norway in May last year on grounds of "emotional disconnect".

Norwegian authorities believe that it would not be in the "best interests" of the kids that they be moved to India now amidst differences between the parents.

Over the past few days, both the parents and the children's uncle, who was to get the custody of the kids, "have changed their position several times on the agreement that had originally been reached. This has caused the Child Welfare Service to doubt their motives as far as the agreement is concerned," CWS chief Gunnar Toreseen said. 

Arunabhash Bhattacharya, the paternal uncle of the children, is in Norway in connection with the case. 

The CWS had a clear intention to sign and implement the agreement but that the events of the last few days now make this impossible, Toresen said. 

In view of the "new developments," the hearing scheduled for tomorrow in the Stavanger District Court will not take place now, the statement said. 

Toresen said the authorities have been made aware of a conflict in the family that could influence the outcome of the case. 

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

SC rejects govt plea for Vodafone case review


Srinagar/Jammu, March 20
At least one person was killed and 17 injured as a cyclonic windstorm swept across the Valley, blowing away hundreds of rooftops, uprooting an even greater number of trees, and disrupting power services on Tuesday.
“The minimum temperature has gone 12°C above normal due to steep pressure gradient over the Valley, causing a wind storm that resulted in damage to property,” Aamir Ali, Coordinator, Disaster Management Cell, Kashmir Division, said. The cyclonic windstorm began yesterday afternoon. The winds touched a maximum speed of 40 knots, with average speed being 24.7 knots, he added.
Mohammed Maqbool Magray was killed when a branch of a “chinar” tree fell on him in Kachnambal village in Ganderbal district. Many tourists had to be evacuated to safety from Dal Lake, officials said. They were accommodated in various hotels by the QRT of the State Disaster Response Force (SDRF) led by Dy SP Ghulam Haider and SDPO Nehru park Ghulam Jeelani.
At Pahalgam, a tree fell on a tourist hut, causing injuries to a tourist from Kolkata, Sanjay Paul. He was rescued and provided treatment at the SDH, Pahalgam, officials said.
At least 17 persons were injured in various incidents. Twenty-nine residential houses were fully damaged while 2,166 non-residential, six government buildings and 10 houseboats were partially damaged.
There are reports of extensive damage to the power supply network across the valley. The work is in progress to make the network fully functional. All commercial flights to and fro Srinagar were, however, operating normally, though with slight delays.
There is also a report of an avalanche in the Badwan area of Bandipore district. Two persons were killed, two injured and one has gone missing in the incident.
Around 200 houses were damaged in Poonch, Ramban and Doda districts of Jammu division due to the dust storm. The storm also caused huge damage to private and government property. Several trees were uprooted and the power network hit. However, no loss of life has been reported from the Jammu region so far.
Assistant Commissioner Revenue, Ramban, Ghanshyam Singh Thakur said 42 private houses, five schools, two shops and a temple had been reportedly damaged in the overnight gale. 

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਗ਼ੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਚਿਤਾਵਨੀ


ਰੋਮ (ਇਟਲੀ), 14 ਮਾਰਚ-ਫਰਾਂਸ ਦੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਨਿਕਲਿਸ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਨੇ ਸਮੁੱਚੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਧਮਕੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਜੇਕਰ ਗ਼ੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ ਨਾ ਰੋਕਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਤਾਂ ਉਹ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਨੂੰ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਦੇ ਵੀਜ਼ਾ ਫਰੀ ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਤੋਂ ਅਲੱਗ ਕਰ ਲੈਣਗੇ। ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਦੇ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਬਹੁਤੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਅਤੇ ਸਵਿਟਜ਼ਰਲੈਂਡ, ਨਾਰਵੇ ਤੇ ਆਇਸਲੈਂਡ ਵਰਗੇ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਦੇ ਨਾਗਰਿਕਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਮਾਮੂਲੀ ਜਿਹੇ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਚੈਕਿੰਗ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਯਾਤਰਾ ਦੀ ਸੁਵਿਧਾ ਮਿਲ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ। ਯਾਦ ਰਹੇ ਜੇ ਇੰਜ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਫਿਰ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਵਿਚ ਜਾਣ ਲਈ ਵੀਜ਼ਾ ਲੈਣਾ ਪਿਆ ਕਰੇਗਾ। ਜਦ ਕਿ ਹੁਣ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਵਸਦੇ ਬਹੁਤੇ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਵੀਜ਼ੇ ਤੋਂ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਸੰਘ ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਆਉਂਦੇ 27 ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਰੋਕ-ਟੋਕ ਦੇ ਜਾਣ-ਆਉਣ ਦੀ ਆਜ਼ਾਦੀ ਹੈ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਉੱਤਰੀ ਪੈਰਿਸ ਵਿਖੇ ਇਕ ਵਿਸ਼ਾਲ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਕ ਰੈਲੀ ਨੂੰ ਸੰਬੋਧਨ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਉਪਰੋਕਤ ਬਿਆਨ ਵਿਚ ਇਹ ਗੱਲ ਕਹੀ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਇਕ ਨਵੇਂ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਕੰਟਰੋਲ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਜੇਕਰ ਆਉਂਦੇ ਵਰ੍ਹੇ ਇਸ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਗੱਲ ਨਾ ਹੋਈ ਤਾਂ ਉਹ ਇਸ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਨੂੰ ਤੋੜ ਕੇ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਨੂੰ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਹਰ ਕਰ ਲੈਣਗੇ। ਪਰਵਾਸ ਦਾ ਮੁੱਦਾ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਦੀ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਕ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਦਾ ਇਕ ਅਹਿਮ ਮਸਲਾ ਬਣਦਾ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀਆਂ ਕਾਰਨ ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਏਕਤਾ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਿਤ ਹੋ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਉਹ ਹੋਰ ਵਧੇਰੇ ਆਵਾਸ, ਨੌਕਰੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਸਿੱਖਿਆ ਮੁਹੱਈਆ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਵਾ ਸਕਦੇ। ਅਜਿਹਾ ਪਹਿਲੀ ਵਾਰੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਸ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਦੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਨੇ ਅਵਾਜ਼ ਉਠਾਈ ਹੈ। ਇਟਲੀ ਵੱਲੋਂ 5 ਅਪ੍ਰੈਲ 2011 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਇਥੇ ਆਏ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਉੱਤਰੀ ਅਫਰੀਕਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਕੱਚਾ ਅਵਾਸ ਪਰਮਿਟ ਦੇਣ ਤੋਂ ਵੀ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਖਫਾ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਇਸ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਉਹ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਫਰੀ ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਖੇਤਰ ਵਿਚ ਸਫਰ ਕਰ ਸਕਣਗੇ।
ਇਟਲੀ ਦੇ ਸਾਬਕਾ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਸਿਲਵੀਓ ਬੈਰਲਿਸਕੋਨੀ ਤੇ ਨਿਕਲੋਸ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਇਕ ਸਾਂਝੇ ਪੱਤਰ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਵਿਚ ਸੋਧਾਂ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਗ਼ੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ ਦਾ ਵਹਾਅ ਰੋਕਣ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਸੰਘ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਕਰ ਚੁੱਕੇ ਹਨ। ਸ੍ਰੀ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਨੇ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ 5 ਸਾਲਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ 18000 ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਸਾਲ ਤੋਂ ਘਟਾ ਕੇ 10000 ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਸਾਲ ਕਰਨ ਬਾਰੇ ਵੀ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਫਰਾਂਸ ਦੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਦੇ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀ ਮੂਲ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਆਏ ਅਜਿਹੇ ਬਿਆਨ ਦੇ ਮੱਦੇਨਜ਼ਰ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਵਿਚ ਹੋਰ ਅਜਿਹੇ ਬਿਆਨ ਆਉਣੇ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਹਨ, ਜਿਸ ਦੇ ਮਾੜੇ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਦਿਨਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਦੇਖੇ ਜਾਣਗੇ। ਅੱਜ ਇਟਾਲੀਅਨ ਮੀਡੀਆ ਵਿਚ ਇਸ ਵਿਸ਼ੇ 'ਤੇ ਚੱਲੇ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਪ੍ਰੋਗਰਾਮਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਚਰਚਾ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਰਹੀ।

Vegreville lawyer named as Alberta farmers’ advocate


EDMONTON - The Alberta government has named Peter Dobbie, a Vegreville lawyer with rural experience, as its new farmers’ advocate.
Dobbie, who starts the job April 2, worked for more than 20 years as a lawyer advising farmers and agribusinesses on business and legal matters.
The Farmers’ Advocate Office assists rural residents with consumer protection, rural opportunities, fair process, managing land assets and interaction with the energy industry.
Dobbie replaces Jim Kiss, who left the post last year after being appointed in 2004.

Alberta Court of Appeal sides with McCauley Community League in fight over apartment building


Alberta provincial court
Alberta Provincial Court
EDMONTON - An Edmonton community league should have been given the right to appeal the construction of a 42-unit apartment intended to house people with chronic addictions, Alberta’s Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.
The written decision seems to throw into question the future of Ambrose Place, which is nearly 75 per cent complete.
Court of Appeal Justice Frans Slatter rebuked the city for failing to notify the McCauley Community League and other neighbours of the property in the first place.
“It is worth noting how unhelpful it was for the development officer not to give notice of this development permit to the appellant and other interested parties” Slatter wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel.
“It was well known that this was a controversial development that was opposed by some people. The failure to give notice created great uncertainty on this file.”
The McCauley Community League filed the appeal against the city, the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board and Niginan Housing Ventures, which is building Ambrose Place at 96th Street and 106th Avenue. The sides presented their arguments Feb. 29.
Tuesday’s ruling showed the case is a tangle of complicated issues.
Because the development officer did not believe the complex to be a special use requiring rezoning — there was a proposed medical component for addiction treatment in the building — rules requiring the city to alert the community of the project and their right to object, were never triggered.
Another critical issue is whether the development permit for Ambrose Place, issued in May 2008, was valid. Typically, builders have one year to start construction on a project. If construction does not start, the permit expires and the developer has to apply for a new permit.
In Tuesday’s ruling, the court agreed that the development permit expired in May 2009, one year after it was issued.
Construction on Ambrose Place did not start, however, until the fall of 2010. The ruling indicates no new development permit was issued. Despite that, the project received a permit from the city in December 2010 to pour a foundation and construction continued through 2011.
The community league tried to plead its case to the Subdivision and Development Appeal board in January 2011, but that quasi-judicial board that helps govern land use matters in the city decided the league was too late to appeal.
On Tuesday, McCauley Community League president Rob Stack described the situation as a “big mess.” The community objected to the proposal in part because they do not believe it complies with the neighbourhood plan and also because they believe McCauley is targeted too often to be the site of social service programs.
Stack said was bizarre and frustrating that construction was allowed to proceed while its future was being considered in court.
“Part of me would like to see this thing ripped out, bulldozed and taken to the ground,” Stack said. “Obviously, it’s been built with millions of dollars in public money and it’s already there. I think we probably need to work with the funders and come up with something that the community will accept and create a viable use for this that will truly enhance the neighbourhood and all the real stakeholders in the area can be happy with.”
Jeremy Taitinger, a lawyer with the firm representing Niginan Housing Ventures, said Tuesday they are reviewing the decision and considering its impact. “We continue to be of the view that this is a good project, it’s good for the city and the community,” he said.
A spokesman for the city said the planning department would not comment on the ruling. Likewise, Gary Dyck, a spokesman with the city’s corporate communications branch, said the city’s Subdivision and Development Appeals Board could not comment on this particular case.
But Coun. Jane Batty, who represents the McCauley neighbourhood on council, said she was happy to learn the community league won its case.
“They have about 45 or 50 social agencies in place, and one of the challenges for them is they don’t want to add more social agencies into the community,” Batty said.
“Without a doubt, the city needs to have a facility like (Ambrose Place), but not in the community of McCauley.”

Thursday, March 8, 2012

NRI returning to India? How to calculate your tax


The grass is not really greener on the other side as many Indians abroad are figuring it out the hard way. Faced with a gloomy economy and career prospects, some are packing their bags and heading back to test the job market.
Though finding a job would be easier in India, especially for those with good degrees and employment background, figuring out the tax liability — especially in the initial years — may be a daunting task. If you are returning to India for employment, there are some tax issues one has to consider before taking the final decision.
This is crucial because the taxability of overseas income (such as rental income from property outside India, capital gains, bank interest, dividends, etc.) for returning Indians largely depends on their residential status in India.  Planning the timing of one’s return is very important.
RESIDENTIAL STATUS
Residency rules play an important role in determining the income that is taxable in India. Indian residency is triggered in either of the following situations:
1. The individual is in India in that financial year for 182 or more days; or
2. The individual is in India in that financial year for 60 or more days and 365 days or more in the four financial years prior to that financial year.
If neither of the above conditions is satisfied, the individual would be treated as a Non-Resident (NR). Satisfying any of the above two conditions would qualify the individual as a resident. Indian tax laws provide a relief for a category of individuals who are ‘Not Ordinarily Resident’ (NOR).
One can become a NOR either if his/her stay in India in the 7 financial years immediately preceding that financial year is less than 729 days or if he/she was a Non-Resident for 9 of the 10 financial years immediately preceding that financial year. A Resident other than a NOR is generally referred to as an Ordinary Resident (‘ROR’).
In case an Indian citizen or a PIO visits India in any tax year, the above mentioned 60 days shall be replaced by 182 days. The proposed Direct Tax Code, however, does not give this preferential benefit to the NRIs or PIO visiting India.
SELLING YOUR PROPERTY ABROAD
As a returning Indian, try to sell your overseas property while you are still a NOR or NR. As a NOR or NR, if you sell any overseas assets and receive the sale proceeds outside India, you do not have to pay any taxes in India. If you need to buy a house in India out of the sale proceeds, you can first receive the sale proceeds in a foreign bank account and thereafter remit part or whole of the proceeds back to India without creating any Indian tax liability.
TAXABILITY AT A GLANCE
i. Income received or deemed to be received or accrues or arises in India during the previous year.
- ROR – Fully Taxable
- NOR/NR – Fully Taxable
ii. Income which accrues or arises outside India and received outside India in the previous year from any other source.
- ROR – Fully Taxable
- NOR/NR – Not Taxable
iii. Income which accrues or arises outside India and received outside India during the preceding previous years and remitted to India during the previous year.
- ROR – Not Taxable
- NOR/NR – Not Taxable

Monday, March 5, 2012

Tori Stafford died from hammer blows to the head, court told


STAFFORDfamily2.jpg
LONDON, Ont. — Eight-year-old Victoria (Tori) Stafford died of repeated blows to the head with a hammer, the jury in the long-awaited criminal trial of the man accused of killing her heard Monday.
Lead prosecutor Kevin Gowdey warned the jury in his opening address that the evidence they will hear will be "disturbing."
"This trial will be hard on all of us," he said. "The evidence in the trial will often be hard to listen to. At times, it will be graphic and unsettling.
"This will be a difficult story to tell and a difficult one to hear."
For more than an hour, Gowdey read aloud a statement to the 12-member jury describing the evidence the Crown will present of its version of the events of April 8, 2009 — the day the Grade 3 student was last seen alive.
Stafford went missing when she failed to make it home from school in Woodstock, Ont., a small city about two hours west of Toronto.
The last image of the petite, blond, blue-eyed girl was a grainy surveillance video that showed her walking hand-in-hand with a woman in a white jacket.
Her remains were found in July 2009 following an exhaustive police search near Guelph, in Mount Forest, Ont., about 200 kilometres away from her school.
Michael Rafferty, 31, of Woodstock, pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder, kidnapping and sexual assault causing bodily harm. He has been in police custody since his arrest in May 2009.
In April 2010, his ex-girlfriend, Terri-Lynne McClintic, was sentenced to life in prison without a chance of parole for 25 years after she pleaded guilty to first-degree murder. She confessed that she was the woman in the white jacket and had lured Stafford away with the promise of meeting a puppy.
Gowdey told the jury that Stafford was driven in Rafferty's Honda Civic with McClintic to the rural location in Mount Forest that evening when she was abducted.
The girl's body eventually was found in a garbage bag buried under a rock pile. She had died of multiple blows to the head with a hammer.
Stafford was also naked from the waist down when she was discovered and was wearing only a Hannah Montana T-shirt and her mother's butterfly earrings, Gowdey said.
"What we could also tell you is that Tori was subjected to blunt force trauma to her torso, sufficient to lacerate her liver. That trauma also caused many fractures to her ribs," he said. "These injuries were almost certainly caused before the fatal hammer blows."
Blood was also found on the frame of Rafferty's car and on his gym bag that was highly likely to be Stafford's, the crown alleges.
Dressed in a grey suit, with a stripped blue tie and wearing glasses, Rafferty sat composed and expressionless in the prisoner's dock throughout the address. At times, he took sips of water from a glass but continued to stare straight ahead.
The Crown says one of Rafferty's former friends will testify that he and McClintic stopped at her house that evening to buy a large number of prescription painkillers. The Crown also promises to present surveillance video and receipts showing that McClintic made a stop at a Home Depot along the way to Guelph to purchase a claw hammer and garbage bags.
Although police never recovered a hammer, the garbage bags were the same brand that Stafford's remains were found in.
Gowdey said McClintic will testify in the upcoming days about her relationship with Rafferty and how he even spoke and visited her multiple times in jail before he was placed in custody.
The Crown says investigators also found a script at McClintic's house coaching her on what she should tell the police if she was ever suspected of being Stafford's abductor.
Posters of the missing girl, which were plastered all over Woodstock and across the country, were also found at both McClintic and Rafferty's homes, said Gowdey.
"In the end, it is not necessary that you determine exactly who did what," he said, adding that jurors need only determine whether the two "acted together."
The jury was told that McClintic's credibility will be put into question once she testifies, but that her knowledge of the disturbing details of this case showed that she had played a role in Stafford's death.
To find Rafferty guilty, they do not need to determine that Rafferty was the one who delivered the blows that ultimately killed the girl, he said. Instead, they only need to determine that her death was deliberate or carried out during the commission of a kidnapping or sexual assault.
"You have been chosen to be the judges of this case," said Gowdey. "Tremendous trust has been placed in you. It will be serious and challenging work."
Outside the courthouse, Rodney Stafford was eager for the trial to begin but expressed concerns that the public has forgotten about his daughter's tragic end.
"It's not about (Michael) Rafferty," said Stafford, who was wearing a purple ribbon in her memory. "It's about a little girl who lost her life and I'm going to make sure we push it and keep it that way."
Through tears, Stafford's grandmother Doreen Graichen said the family has many "good memories" of the girl and are prepared for the worst during this trial.
"Nothing could be any worse than what I imagined anyway," she said, pointing out a butterfly pendant she was wearing for Stafford.
The girl's mother, Tara McDonald, also was at the courthouse but did not speak to media. She will be testifying in the upcoming days about the last time she saw her daughter.
The Crown will call their first witness Tuesday. It is expected it will be Stafford's former teacher.
Ontario Superior Justice Thomas Heeney, who is presiding over the trial, reminded jurors that Rafferty has pleaded not guilty to all charges and that he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Rafferty's lawyer, Dirk Derstine, said he continues to hope the public will continue to hold their judgment until the end of the trial.
"It is very easy to want to judge someone who is nearby to all of the action," he said.
Earlier in the day, the proceedings were unexpectedly delayed for more than an hour for a closed-door meeting between the judge and the lawyers in the case. No reasons were given for the delay.
The trial is expected to last two and a half months and is under heavy police security.
The London, Ont., courtroom and an overflow room streaming the proceedings were both packed with media and interested members of the public Monday.
The high-profile trial was moved out of Woodstock because it was believed Rafferty would not be able to get a fair trial in the hometown he shared with the murdered girl.

Friday, March 2, 2012

40k Indians may be allowed to work in Europe

London, March 2
At least 40,000 Indians may be allowed to work in Europe, including 12,000 in Britain alone, under a secret trade plan between the European Union and New Delhi, a media report said, citing leaked documents.
The EU has proposed that 40,000 Indian workers will be admitted to Europe without any labour market test as part of the plan to boost export trade with New Delhi, the ‘Daily Mail’ reported, quoting a leaked copy of the EU/India Free Trade Agreement, which is due to be signed later this year.
Central to the agreement is the EU’s offer on what is known as “Mode 4”, which will allow Indian companies to bring temporary workers into the EU, the newspaper said.
According to the leaked papers, out of 40,000 Indians who would be allowed to work in Europe, Britain has been asked to take 12,000, which is 30 per cent of the total allocation, despite the UK making up 12 per cent of the EU’s population.
The 12,000 Indian migrants, who would be able to live and work in Britain for six months, will be in addition to people given visas under Britain’s supposedly strict immigration cap, the newspaper said.
A large number of beneficiaries will be IT workers who already arrive in Britain from India in large numbers, the report added. According to EU officials, in return for opening up the jobs market, countries such as Britain will be helped to land lucrative export deals.
The negotiations on the India deal, first initiated by Former EU Trade Commissioner Lord Mandelson in 2007 and subsequently led by the Business Department, was going on in the shadows for years, the daily said.