Sunday, July 29, 2012

Sex with wife who is below 15 years is rape, says High Court

New Delhi : Consummation of marriage with a girl below the age of 15 amounts to rape, even though the husband is entitled to the girl’s custody, the Delhi High Court said.
The court observation came as it noted that girls, who are married before the age of 15, had the liberty to approach the court get the marriage declared void till the age of 20. “Consummation with wife below age of 15 years is an offence under Section 375 of IPC (rape). No exception can be made to the said Constitutional mandate, and the same has to be strictly and diligently enforced,” a three-judge bench, headed by Acting Chief Justice A K Sikri, said.
The court said allowing the husband to consummate marriage with a minor would not be appropriate, more so in the light of the fact that the Prevention of Child Marriage Act was introduced to ensure that a child is not married at an age when he or she is psychologically fit to take the decision.
“Such a marriage, after all, is voidable, and the girl child still has the right to approach the court seeking to exercise her option to get the marriage declared as void till she attains the age of 20 years,” said the bench, also comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and V K Shali.
The court said an FIR for rape and kidnap registered against a person, who eloped with a girl below the age of 15, could not be quashed even if the girl said she entered into the marriage willingly. It said consent at such a young age was difficult to accept.
For cases where a girl is more than 16 years and tells the court that she went on her own will with a man, the court said it can accept the statement and the FIR can be quashed, if it was satisfied as to the girl’s maturity and understanding.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

SC: panchayats enjoy Constitutional status

 
NEW DELHI:  Panchayats can formulate their own programmes of economic development and social justice as they enjoy a Constitutional status, the Supreme Court has ruled.
The apex court said Article 40 and Articles 243 to 243-O envisages that the framers of the Constitution had envisaged village panchayat to be the foundation of the country's political democracy - a decentralised form of government where each village was to be responsible for its own affairs.
Bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhya passed the ruling while allowing an appeal filed by the village panchayat of Calangute in Goa challenging a Bombay High Court order which had taken the view that the local body cannot challenge any decision taken by the executive authority.
In this case, the Additional Director of Panchayat-II had overruled a resolution passed by the panchayat quashing the permission granted to a private company for carrying out certain commercial activities.
Though the panchayat appealed against the official's decision the high court dismissed it following which it appealed in the apex court.
"The primary focus of the subjects enumerated in the Eleventh Schedule is on social and economic development of the rural parts of the country by conferring upon the Panchayat the status of a constitutional body.
"Parliament has ensured that the Panchayats would no longer perform the role of simply executing the programmes and policies evolved by the political executive of the state. 
"By virtue of the provisions contained in Part IX, the panchayats have been empowered to formulate and implement their own programs of economic development and social justice in tune with their status as the third tier of Government which is mandated to represent the interests of the people living within its jurisdiction", the Bench said. 
The apex court said the Constitution's Preamble, Part IV and Part IX must guide our understanding of the Panchayati Raj institutions and the role they play in the lives of the people in rural parts of the country.
"The conceptualisation of the village panchayat as a unit of self government having the responsibility to promote social justice and economic development and as a representative of the people within its jurisdiction must be borne in mind while interpreting the laws enacted by the state which seek to define the ambit and scope of the powers and the functions of Panchayats at various levels.
"An analysis of Article 40 and Articles 243 to 243-O shows that the framers of the Constitution had envisaged village panchayat to be the foundation of the country's political democracy - a decentralised form of government where each village was to be responsible for its own affairs," the Bench said.
According to the court by enacting the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, Parliament has attempted to remedy the defects and remove the deficiencies of the Panchayati Raj system evolved after independence, which failed to live up to the expectation of the people in rural India.
"The provisions contained in Part IX provide firm basis for self-governance by the people at the grass root through the institution of panchayats at different levels.
"For achieving the objectives enshrined in Part IX of the Constitution, the state legislatures have enacted laws and made provision for devolution of powers upon and assigned various functions listed in the Eleventh Schedule to the Panchayats", the court said.
Hence it directed the High Court to issue notices on the issue raised by the panchayat and decide the matter on merits. PTI 

TIME LINE: THE CASE
2006: Calangute panchayat grants permission to builder for construction at Porbawado, Calangute. Locals complain that builder has blocked access to well and chapel.
MARCH 2008: Following complaints, Calangute panchayat passes resolution for revocation of occupancy certificate.
MARCH 2009: The panchayat passes another resolution and revokes permission to the company. 
2009: Company challenges the ruling on grounds that it was contrary to rules of natural justice.
JULY 2009:Panchayat revokes earlier resolution and issues notice to the company to   stop further construction and fixes site inspection for August 4, 2009.
2009: Company challenges panchayat notice before Additional Director of Panchayat, who passes ex-parte interim order.
JULY 2009: Company applies for permission to use property as guest house, but panchayat rejects application. Company then challenges the decision.
FEBRUARY 2010: Additional Director of Panchayat passes final order, directing panchayat to reconsider application of the company for grant of permission to use the property for running a guest house.  
2010: Panchayat challenges order in High Court, but High Court dismisses petition.
Panchayat then challenges matter before Supreme Court.

Friday, May 11, 2012

CANADA-BASED NRI’S DEATH


It’s a murder, allege kin 
Ludhiana, May 10
A day after the Jagraon police booked four "contract marriage" agents allegedly for forcing 22-year-old Canada-based NRI Amanpal to commit suicide and dumping his body in a canal, Tajinder Singh, victim's brother and other relatives, today claimed that he was killed by the four persons.
Tajinder, a native of Jalandhar settled in Bramption, Canada, met police officials in Jagraon today. He alleged that the police was insisting that Amanpla had committed suicide.
"My brother had told me on the phone that he wanted to return to Canada, but Kulwant Singh, Aman and Karamjit Kaur, alias Kammo, had confiscated his passport. He was not someone who could commit suicide," said Tajinder.
The police has initiated its probe on the suicide theory merely on the statements of the accused even as the dead body has not been recovered so far, he added.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Delhi High Court has ordered removal of objectionable blog against Art of Living (AoL) founder and spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar


The Delhi High Court has ordered removal of objectionable blogs and remarks posted by a man against Art of Living (AoL) founder and spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar on Google's website www.Blogger.Com.

While ordering removal of his "defamatory" blogs, Justice Manmohan Singh also restrained blogger Jitender Bagga from sending objectionable emails and publishing blogs on the website against the AoL founder.

The court order came on an NGO's civil suit, seeking damages of over Rs 5 crore from the blogger and the website.

"It appears that the plaintiffs (NGO and its volunteers) have been able to make out a strong prima facie case for passing an ex-parte interim order. The balance of convenience also lies in favour the plaintiff and against the defendants (Bagga and the website).

In case, interim order is not passed, the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable loss and injury. Thus, till the next date, the defendant 2 (website) is directed to remove all defamatory contents about the plaintiffs posted by defendant 1 (Bagga) on website www.Blogger.Com," the court said.

"Bagga is restrained from sending any email or posting any material over the website which has a direct or indirect reference to the plaintiffs or the Art of Living Foundation or any member of AoL or His Holiness Sri Sri Ravi Shankar," the court said.

Filing a civil suit through its trustee Mahesh Gupta, the NGO Vyakti Vikas Kendra, India Public Charitable Trust has sought a damage of Rs 5.9 crore from Bagga and the website.

It alleged Bagga has created and published various materials against the volunteers of this NGO, which promotes spiritual, educational, cultural and social developmental activities and also runs the programme called AoL. It added Bagga has published materials against its founder Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and his family members.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

ਸਿੱਖ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਪਟੀਸ਼ਨ ਦੇ ਸਮਰਥਨ 'ਚ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਤੋਂ ਦਸਤਖਤੀ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਆਰੰਭ


ਸਿੱਖ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਦਸਤਖਤੀ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਵਿਚ ਸ਼ਾਮਿਲ ਵੱਡੀ ਗਿਣਤੀ ਵਿਚ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਵਾਸੀ।

ਵੈਨਕੂਵਰ, 9 ਮਈ - ਨਵੰਬਰ 2012 ਵਿਚ ਸਿੱਖਸ ਫਾਰ ਜਸਟਿਸ ਅਤੇ ਆਲ ਇੰਡੀਆ ਸਿੱਖ ਸਟੂਡੈਂਟਸ ਫੈਡਰੇਸ਼ਨ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਪਟੀਸ਼ਨ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਅੱਗੇ ਦਾਇਰ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਵੇਗੀ। ਜਿਸ ਵਿਚ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਤੋਂ ਮੰਗ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਵੇਗੀ ਕਿ ਨਵੰਬਰ 1984 ਦੇ ਪਹਿਲੇ ਹਫਤੇ ਦੌਰਾਨ ਸਮੁੱਚੇ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਚ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ 'ਤੇ ਸੰਗਠਿਤ ਤੇ ਯੋਜਨਾਬੱਧ ਤਰੀਕੇ ਨਾਲ ਕੀਤੇ ਗਏ ਹਮਲਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਜਾਂਚ ਕਰਵਾਈ ਜਾਵੇ ਤੇ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਬਾਰੇ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਕਨਵੈਨਸ਼ਨ ਤਹਿਤ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਵਜੋਂ ਮਾਨਤਾ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਜਾਵੇ। ਇਸ ਮੰਤਵ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤੀ ਲਈ ਸਿੱਖਸ ਫਾਰ ਜਸਟਿਸ ਸੰਸਥਾ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਤੋਂ ਦਸਤਖਤੀ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਦਾ ਆਰੰਭ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਸ਼ਹਿਰਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਵਿਸ਼ਾਲ ਇਕੱਠਾਂ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਸੰਸਥਾਵਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਜਥੇਬੰਦੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਇਸ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਵਿਚ ਸ਼ਾਮਿਲ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ। ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਕਾਲ ਤਖਤ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੇ ਆਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਤਹਿਤ ਨਵੰਬਰ 1984 ਦੇ ਪੀੜਤਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਇਨਸਾਫ ਦਿਵਾਉਣ ਲਈ ਜਦੋ ਜਹਿਦ ਕਰ ਰਹੀ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਸੰਸਥਾ ਸਿੱਖਸ ਫਾਰ ਜਸਟਿਸ ਨੇ ਨਵੰਬਰ 1984 ਦੌਰਾਨ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ 'ਤੇ ਸੰਗਠਿਤ ਕਤਲੇਆਮ ਦੀ ਜਾਂਚ ਲਈ ਵਿਸ਼ੇਸ਼ ਕਮਿਸ਼ਨ ਦਾ ਗਠਨ ਕਰਨ ਅਤੇ ਨਵੰਬਰ 1984 ਵਿਚ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਤਲੇਆਮ ਨੂੰ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਵਜੋਂ ਮਾਨਤਾ ਦੇਣ ਲਈ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਅੱਗੇ ਦਾਇਰ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਣ ਵਾਲੀ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਪਟੀਸ਼ਨ ਦੇ ਸਮਰਥਨ ਵਿਚ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਵਿਚ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਡੇਅ ਨਗਰ ਕੀਰਤਨ ਮੌਕੇ 'ਹਾਂ ਇਸ ਨਸਲਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਹੈ', ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਦੀ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ ਕੀਤੀ। ਸਿੱਖਸ ਫਾਰ ਜਸਟਿਸ ਦੇ ਕੋਆਰਡੀਨੇਟਰ ਜਤਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਗਰੇਵਾਲ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਦੇ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ ਵਾਲੇ ਦਿਨ ਹੀ 10 ਹਜ਼ਾਰ ਦਸਤਖਤ ਇਕੱਠੇ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਸੀ। ਸਿੱਖ ਫਾਰ ਜਸਟਿਸ ਦੇ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਸਲਾਹਕਾਰ ਅਟਾਰਨੀ ਗੁਰਪਤਵੰਤ ਸਿੰਘ ੰਪੰਨੂ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰ ਵਿਚ ਪਟੀਸ਼ਨ ਦਾਇਰ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਕਾਲ ਤਖਤ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦਾ ਹੁਕਮਨਾਮਾ ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਆਇਆ ਹੈ ਜਦੋਂ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਚਲੀਆਂ ਸਮੇਂ-ਸਮੇਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਸਰਕਾਰਾਂ ਨਵੰਬਰ 1984 ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਤਲੇਆਮ ਦੀ ਜਾਂਚ ਕਰਵਾਉਣ ਤੇ ਇਸ ਦੇ ਦੋਸ਼ੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਜ਼ਾ ਦਿਵਾਉਣ ਵਿਚ ਨਾਕਾਮ ਰਹੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੇ ਦੱਸਿਆ ਕਿ ਟੋਰਾਂਟੋ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਵਿਚ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ 'ਹਾਂ ਇਹ ਨਸਲੀਕੁਸ਼ੀ ਹੈ' ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਨੂੰ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਵਿਚ ਤੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਨ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਦੇ ਹੋਰ ਮੁਲਕਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਲਿਜਾਈ ਜਾਵੇਗੀ ਜਿਥੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਭਾਈਚਾਰੇ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਡੀ ਪੱਧਰ 'ਤੇ ਦਸਤਖਤ ਕਰਵਾਏ ਜਾਣਗੇ।

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Anand Marriage Bill introduced in Rajya Sabha

New Delhi, May 7
The government today brought before Parliament a Bill to amend the 103-year-old statute that hitherto allowed solemnisation of Sikh marriages but not their legal validation.
The Anand Marriage Amendment Bill:2012, introduced in the Rajya Sabha today by Law Minister Salman Khurshid, amends the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, by inserting a new Section enabling registration of marriages performed as per the Sikh rituals (Anand Karaj).
The amendment Bill defines the Sikh marriage ceremony as “Anand Karaj” instead of “Anand” as in the old law. Once passed by both Houses of Parliament, it will give the Sikhs the liberty to register their marriages separately and will exempt them from registering these under the Registration of Births, Marriages and Deaths Act, 1969 (which the government plans to amend to provide for religion neutral registration of marriages across India).
The Sikhs would continue to have the option of registering their marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as before. It was registration under this Act that had been causing confusion about their religious identity abroad with their marriage certificates describing them as Hindus.
Importantly, the amendment Bill doesn’t provide for divorce among Sikh couples. For a divorce, they would have to use the Hindu Marriage Act.
Senior Supreme Court lawyer HS Phoolka, commenting on the matter, said: “Because the amendment Bill serves a limited purpose of giving Sikh religion a separate identity by allowing marriage registration under a pre-existing law, it is not a complete marriage law.
“Any religion to be recognised must have its separate ceremony of births, deaths and marriages. Sikhs didn’t have a separate marriage law so far and they wanted the Anand Marriage Act amended for the purpose. For divorce, Sikhs can use the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.”
The amendment Bill clearly states that “parties whose marriage has been registered under this Act won’t be required to get marriage registered under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, after the enactment of the proposed amendments in this Bill.” “Today we have won the battle for a separate identity as a religion,” said former MP Tarlochan Singh who led the movement for the Bill. “The SGPC is also against any divorce provision under the Anand Marriage Amendment Bill,” he said. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law had approved these amendments in 2007 when Veerappa Moily was Law Minister. “The Bill need not go again to the standing committee and can be simply taken up and passed,” Tarlochan Singh added.
No provision of divorce in the new BillFor seeking divorce, Sikhs would have to use the Hindu Marriage Act. The Union Cabinet had approved amendment to the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, on April 12 this year.

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Jean McBean fought for women’s rights as trailblazing lawyer

Jean McBean, 1997
Jean McBean
EDMONTON — In the early 1980s, when law offices were the domain of men in dark suits, Jean McBean took a notion and opened Edmonton’s first all-female law firm where the children of the four lawyer moms could come after school to do their homework.
The firm’s specialty was family law in an era when the battle for women’s equality was transforming divorce, child custody and rules for sharing property after marriage breakups. McBean Becker Cochard and Gordon was on the cutting edge of this major social change.
Yes, you might find toast crusts stuffed into computers or kid-size finger smudges on the boardroom table, recalls former law partner Marie Gordon. But McBean and company were determined to show women could be excellent lawyers and moms and have a family life, too — a radical notion at the time.
That wasn’t the only radical notion McBean took up. An influential figure in Edmonton legal circles, Jean McBean was a committed reformer for social justice. She wanted a fairer system of family law and went to the Supreme Court of Canada, lobbied cabinet ministers, wrote books and lectured across the country about dramatic changes of the 1970s — from marriage contracts to maternity leave.
She took on other jobs, too — lay minister at a Unitarian church, community volunteer, a one-time New Democrat candidate for Parliament, a mother to two girls with her husband, John Worton, also an Edmonton lawyer.
Her last job, which caused her to close her law practice and move to Victoria in 2008, was as a devoted grandmother to two boys, Oliver and Finnigan, the children of her daughter Jane and husband Greg Awai.
McBean died April 7 in Victoria from cancer. She was 63.
Born in London, England, in 1948, McBean came to Edmonton as a young girl of working-class parents. Her father believed in education for girls as teachers and nurses. A friendly priest intervened and McBean ended up with a law degree in 1972 from the University of Alberta.
At the time, no-fault divorce didn’t exist, divorced women had no right to a share in the family home and the U of A law school had some strange customs (more on that later).
Then came the Murdoch case — southern Alberta rancher Irene Murdoch, who was denied a share of the ranch post-divorce despite years of running it — and it sparked a revolution across the country.
By the 1980, almost every province had revamped matrimonial property laws and, in Alberta, McBean played a key role in these changes.
Her husband of 44 years, John Worton, says McBean’s work on Alberta’s new Matrimonial Property Act, along with a handful of other young female Edmonton lawyers, was probably her biggest achievement.
Daughter Bevin agrees.
“At the end of the day, what she wanted was fairness, a better deal for families,” said Bevin, noting that McBean represented both mothers and fathers in her practice.
“Her approach was, if something was wrong, there had to be change.”
And she was fearless in tackling change, says John, recalling the story of the naked women photos at the U of A law school.
In those pre-feminist days, law students would post pictures of naked women from a certain magazine on announcements for law school social events. The Christmas Party poster, put in the library, might carry the full frontal nudity of Miss December.
McBean and a handful of women decided that should stop. When their request was turned down, they decided to fight fire with fire.
But to find pictures of naked men was impossible in pre-Playgirl days.
So Jean, a young student in her 20s, went on a mission to the less desirable parts of 97th Street. In an adult shop, she asked for photos of naked men, scandalizing the male shopkeeper who insisted she was in the wrong store.
“But the woman behind the counter quietly pulled out some photos held discreetly behind on a shelf,” recalls Worton.
Back at the law school, the women students made new posters with the male photos and tried to post them. Of course, they were accused of posting smut.
“There was fury in the law school,” Worton said. But that was the last time nude of photos of anyone were used.
The family lived in Bonnie Doon near Mill Creek, except for a couple of years in the late 1980s when Jean went to Montreal with her two daughters do a master’s degree at McGill University.
Big-hearted and practical, “she could not bear to see a child in distress,” recalls Bevin. So she opened their home to teenagers who needed support.
Driven by her strong beliefs in social justice, McBean joined the New Democrats. In fact, she met her husband at a social event for Young New Democrats in 1968.
In 1990, McBean served on Alberta’s electoral boundaries commission when the ND party was official Opposition. She became party president while Ray Martin was party leader. But times were about to change. In the 1993 election, the New Democrats were wiped out, losing all 15 of their legislature seats.
“It was devastating, but Jean was a stalwart and kept the party together while it regrouped,” said Martin.
At a memorial service, Bevin heard an amusing story about her mom, who loved opera, theatre and the symphony.
When the Worton-McBeans donated a chair to the Winspear Centre, Jean thought it was too ostentatious to have their names inscribed on their gift. Instead, she wanted the words “Till we have built Jerusalem.”
Winspear fundraisers were flummoxed. Was this lefty couple perpetrating some kind of hidden political message on their chair?
The crisis passed when a fellow lawyer explained the words came from a well-known English hymn, based on a poem by poet William Blake. It was McBean’s favourite hymn and it featured prominently in her memorial service in Victoria last week.
“She was my love and my most constant companion,” said John, 65. “We loved many of the same things and did so much together.”
A celebration of her life will take place on Friday, May 11, at the north Unitarian Church in Edmonton.

Facebook IPO to make Zuckerbeg pay $903-mn in taxes

The US tax authorities are in for a major windfall from Facebook chief Mark Zukerberg, as the upcoming IPO of the social networking giant could make him pay in taxes as much as USD 903 million (about Rs 5,000 crore).
Interestingly, his total estimated tax payout amounts to more than 85 per cent of the total proceeds of about USD 1.045 billion Zuckerbeg is expected to rake in from part sale of his own shares in Facebook -- leaving him with a net cash proceeds of just about USD 142 million (about Rs 700 crore).
Facebook's IPO is slated to hit the market later this year and could fetch in between USD 77-96 billion, depending on the investors' appetite.
The IPO roadshow, which would seek to attract investors for putting in their money in the social media behemoth, would begin tomorrow.
As per an analysis by US-based research firm, PrivCo, the 27-year old Zukerberg stands to pay as much as USD 714 million in national taxes and another USD 189 million as state taxes to California, while still pocketing USD 142 million.
"According to our calculations, Mark Zuckerberg will be paying an estimated USD189 million payment to the State of California this year as a result of the Facebook IPO, expected to be completed this month," PrivCo Founder & CEO Sam Hamadeh said.
PrivCo assumes total tax of 43 per cent, a combination of maximum federal tax of 36 per cent and the maximum California tax of 9.3 per cent, less partial federal deductions for state taxes paid.
"He will have to incur a combined state and federal tax rate of 43 per cent on the USD 2.1 billion for a total tax payment of USD 903 million incurred at the IPO date," PrivCo said in its report.
The agency added that the tax proceeds from Zuckerberg will help the State of California deal with budget deficits.
"The funds are badly needed as California continues to suffer from budget deficits, and could not have come at a better time for the state," Hamadeh said.
Zuckerberg, who holds a total of 533.8 million shares, would sell 30.2 million shares in the IPO -- garnering about USD 1.05 billion in cash at the high end of the proposed price range of USD 28-35 for the sale of shares. The 30.2 million shares, PrivCo noted, would be used to finance the tax liability due at the time of the IPO.
The remaining 504 million shares held by the young CEO after the IPO would be worth USD 17.6 billion, if Facebook hits the top of its IPO price range.
"More taxes will come due as more shares are sold beginning in December and well into 2013 after the traditional 180-day post-IPO 'lock-up' period expires and employees can sell even more shares, resulting in new capital gains taxes to California - and the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) - with each new stock sale," Hamdeh noted.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

ਜਸਵਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਦਾ ਐਡਮਿੰਟਨ, ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਵਿਖੇ ਨਿੱਘਾ ਸਵਾਗਤ



ਜਸਵਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਨੂੰ ਸਨਮਾਨਿਤ ਕਰਦੇ ਵਿਧਾਇਕ ਪੀਟਰ ਸੰਧੂ, ਵਿਧਾਇਕ ਨਰੇਸ਼ ਭਾਰਦਵਾਜ
ਐਡਮਿੰਟਨ, 3 ਮਈ - ਪਿਛਲੇ ਦਿਨੀਂ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਦੀ ਫੇਰੀ 'ਤੇ ਆਏ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਜਸਵਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਬਾਘਾ ਪੁਰਾਣਾ ਐਡਮਿੰਟਨ ਨਿਵਾਸੀ ਸ਼ਮਸ਼ੇਰ ਬਰਾੜ ਦੇ ਸੱਦੇ 'ਤੇ ਐਡਮਿੰਟਨ ਪੁੱਜੇ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਸਵਾਗਤ ਲਈ ਬਰਾੜ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਨੇ ਸਥਾਨਕ ਮਹਾਰਾਜਾ ਹਾਲ ਵਿਖੇ ਪ੍ਰੋਗਰਾਮ ਕੀਤਾ। ਸਮਾਗਮ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨਗੀ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਜਸਵਿੰਦਰ ਨੇ ਪੁੱਜੇ ਸ਼ਹਿਰ ਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਗੰਭੀਰਤਾ ਨਾਲ ਦੱਸਿਆ ਕਿ ਜਦੋਂ ਵੀ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ 'ਚ ਵਸਦੇ ਭਾਈਚਾਰੇ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ ਚੱਲ-ਅਚੱਲ ਜਾਇਦਾਦ ਨੂੰ ਵਿਕਰੀ ਕਰਨ ਦਾ ਹੱਕ ਆਪਣੇ ਰਿਸ਼ਤੇਦਾਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਨਹੀਂ ਦੇਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ ਜਾਇਦਾਦ ਨੂੰ ਲੀਜ਼, ਸਾਂਝ ਸੰਭਾਲ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਹੱਕ ਦੇਣੇ ਚਾਹੀਦੇ ਹਨ। ਅੱਜਕਲ੍ਹ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਵਿਖੇ ਜਾਇਦਾਦਾਂ ਲੱਖਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਕਰੋੜਾਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਬਣ ਚੁੱਕੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਇਥੇ ਵਸਦਾ ਭਾਈਚਾਰਾ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਆਪਣੀ ਜਾਇਦਾਦ ਨੂੰ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਬੈਠੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਹਾਇਤਾ ਵਜੋਂ ਉਸ ਦੀ ਆਮਦਨ ਵਰਤਣ ਲਈ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਪ੍ਰੰਤੂ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿਚ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਵਸਦਾ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਉਸ ਜਾਇਦਾਦ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ ਹੀ ਸਮਝ ਬੈਠਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਕਾਰਨ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀਆਂ ਦੀ ਜਾਇਦਾਦਾਂ ਉੱਪਰ ਕਬਜ਼ੇ ਆਮ ਹੋ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ। ਇਸ ਕਰਕੇ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿਚ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਦੁਬਾਰਾ ਜਾਣ ਦਾ ਨਾਂਅ ਤੱਕ ਨਹੀਂ ਲੈਂਦੇ। ਸਮਾਗਮ ਵਿਚ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਜਸਵਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਨੂੰ ਵਿਧਾਇਕ ਪੀਟਰ ਸੰਧੂ, ਸਿੱਖ ਫੈਡਰੇਸ਼ਨ ਦੇ ਕਰਨੈਲ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਿਉਲ, ਵਿਧਾਇਕ ਨਰੇਸ਼ ਭਾਰਦਵਾਜ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਸਨਮਾਨ ਚਿੰਨ੍ਹ ਵੀ ਭੇਟ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ। ਇਸ ਮੌਕੇ ਸ਼ਮਸ਼ੇਰ ਬਰਾੜ, ਹੈਰੀ ਬਰਾੜ, ਤੀਰਥ ਬਰਾੜ, ਬਲਦੇਵ ਧਾਲੀਵਾਲ ਤੋਂ ਇਲਾਵਾ ਦਰਜਨਾਂ ਨਿਵਾਸੀ ਹਾਜ਼ਰ ਸਨ।

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Runaway couples cautioned


Think twice before ‘rebellion marriage’, says High Court
Chandigarh, April 12
Cautioning runaway couples against running down established social norms while racing towards the hymenal altar, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has asked them to “think twice” before according precedence to individual interests over that of society’s.
The assertion by Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik, aimed at easing tension between interests of individuals and a group as a whole, came while dealing with nearly a dozen protection petitions filed on a single day by runaway couples.
In one of the petitions, Kirti Goyal and another petitioner had sought directions to the State of Punjab and other respondents to protect their life and liberty on the ground that they “ had tried to persuade their parents and relatives, but in vain.”
Referring to Supreme Court judgments on the right to life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, Justice Malik asserted: “It is equally important to note that freedom of the individual is not absolute, but subject to the established and time-tested social norms of a civilised society.
“Co-existence of freedom of the individual and social control is sine-qua-non (an essential element or condition) for sustainable progress of society and this is also an integral part of our Constitutional philosophy.
“Therefore, though the petitioners are entitled to protection to their life and liberty in the given facts and circumstances of the case, but at the same time, it is also expected of them and other young citizens like them that before running away from their homes for performing this type of rebellion marriage, they must think twice, besides, listening carefully to their parents who are not their enemies, but genuine well- wishera.”
Justice Malik also said: “Let us welcome the dynamic social change and evolution, but only subject to the social control and moral values which are centuries old and have not lost their shine even today ”.
Before parting with the orders in almost all the cases on the issue, Justice Malik said: “It is also made clear that this order shall not entitle the petitioners for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any criminal proceedings, if they are found involved in the commission of any cognisable offence...”

Punjab to ban mobile phones inside jails


Jail Staff to get walkie-talkie sets
Patiala, April 12
Following complaints of illegal use of mobile phones by prisoners, the Punjab Jails Department has decided to completely ban carrying of mobile phones inside the jails. As an alternative, jail officials will be provided walkie-talkie sets to ensure that even they do not carry their personal mobile phones inside the jails.
Sources said while a move of installing jammers inside the jails was still in the pipeline, officials had been briefed about banning the use of mobile phones inside the jails. "Mobile phones will be banned inside jails even for superintendents and others staff who will be provided walkie-talkie sets," they said.
An official said, "The state government's pilot project to install jammers in all jails is yet to see light of the day due to shortage of funds. However, a sum of Rs 4 crore has been earmarked for modernisation of jail equipment, including modern communication devices for jail staff".
In the recent past, over 1,000 mobile phones had been recovered from jail inmates across the state.
In a recent case, allegations were levelled against former SGPC president Bibi Jagir Kaur for allegedly using her mobile phone inside the Kapurthala Jail in violation of the Jail Manual. However, once jammers are installed and walkie-talkie sets are given to the jail staff, such violations will be checked.
The sources said many criminals lodged in jails were allegedly running their gangs from there itself. The Jail Manual stipulates that there is no proper provision to book them for using mobile phone. "Punjab DGP (Jails) Shashi Kant is keen to get funds to buy jammers to curb illegal activities of inmates," said a senior jail officer.
At present, Punjab has seven Central Jails located at Patiala, Bathinda, Ferozepur, Amritsar, Gurdaspur, Jalandhar and Ludhiana, five districts jails located at Nabha, Sangrur, Faridkot, Kapurthala and Hoshiarpur, two open-air jails located at Nabha and Kapurthala, one women's jail at Ludhiana and 10 sub-jails at Fazilka, Majha, Mukatsar, Patti, Ropar, Barnala, Malerkotla, Phagwara, Dasuya and Pathankot. Besides, there is a jail training school located at Patiala.
“We will surely implement many more jail reforms, including banning of mobile phones from inside jails soon,” said DGP (Jails) Shashi Kant.
JAMMING NETWORK
  • In the recent past, over 1,000 mobile phones had been recovered from jail inmates across the state
  • The government's pilot project to install jammers in all jails is yet to see light of the day due to shortage of funds
  • A sum of Rs 4 crore has been earmarked for modernisation of jail equipment, including modern communication sets for jail staff.

Bill C-10 makes crossing U.S. border tougher if you have a criminal record


VANCOUVER - The recent passage of Bill C-10, the federal Safe Streets and Communities Act, has made crossing into the U.S. from Canada more difficult for anyone with a criminal record.
A solution can be provided by Commissionaires B.C., but getting a waiver won't be cheap and it could take as long as a year or more, according to Deb Barnett, supervisor of identification for the organization.
Barnett said a Canadian ``record suspension'' is most important for employment reasons. But the new crime law has extended the waiting period for that to five years from three years for less serious offences and to 10 years from five years for indictable offences.
Anyone with three indictable offences leading to prison sentences of more than two years each can't get their record wiped clean. Neither can someone convicted of sex offences against a child.
But getting a U.S. entry waiver is critical for travel to or through the U.S.
``This has some pretty major effects on people's lives,'' said Barnett.
She cited two cases of people who came directly to her office after being turned back at Vancouver International Airport.
One was heading to the U.S. to visit his dying sister in hospital. A random check revealed he had an assault on his record from a marital dispute more than 20 years in the past and he was rejected.
The other man was heading to his second home in Palm Springs, Ariz., to join family members who had travelled ahead of him. A random check of the man, who was in his 50s, turned up a marijuana possession from when he was 18.
``He had no idea they were doing this,'' said Barnett of the checks.
The Commissionaires are an independent, non-profit security organization that provides meaningful work for former Canadian Forces and RCMP members. There are other companies that also deal with the complicated process of getting what used to be called ``pardons'' but are now, since March 12, called ``record suspensions.''
Barnett pointed out that a Canadian pardon is not recognized by U.S. border guards.
That's where a U.S. entry waiver, which is granted by the Department of Homeland Security, is required. It costs $585 US, payable to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
All of this requires getting criminal record files, for which the Commissionaires charge a service fee. The fee for that is $399 but the total for the entire process averages $1,059.
Criminal records are kept in the Canadian Police Information Centre, which can be accessed by U.S. Customs. If a U.S. official has accessed that record it remains in their database even if that record is wiped out by a pardon in Canada.
That's why the entry waiver is critical.

Harper's drug stance may put him on the outs at Summit of the Americas

South American leaders advocate drug decriminalization
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper is flying to a weekend summit in Colombia where his hard line on drugs will put him at odds with some Latin American leaders who are calling for a debate over whether drug use should be decriminalized.
Harper's position on Cuba also could run afoul of a possible consensus by countries in central and South America.
Harper is attending the Summit of the Americas, a conference of leaders from 34 nations that is held every three years.
The talks this year will include such issues as trade expansion, and Harper will meet with senior business executives from Canada and elsewhere who are attending the summit to discuss investment in the Western Hemisphere.
As well, it's expected many Latin American leaders will argue the time has come, after decades of being barred from the summit, for Cuba to be invited to the next gathering.
That will run counter to the firm positions of Canada and the United States, which insist Cuba should not be permitted to attend the next summit until the communist regime initiates democratic reforms.
Meanwhile, another issue — illicit drugs — is top of mind for some leaders. The escalating violence connected to warring drug cartels in Latin America has some nations insisting it's time for a new approach: softer penalties for drug use or perhaps even a decriminalized system in which governments regulate how the drugs are sold.
To varying degrees, the leaders of Guatemala, Colombia, Mexico and Costa Rica have spoken out in favour of exploring approaches other than the criminal to the problem of illegal drug use.
But on Thursday, Harper's director of communications said Canada will argue strenuously against decriminalization of illegal drugs.
"The prime minister would be a strong voice in that debate," said Andrew MacDougall. "The government's strategy is, in fact, completely in the opposite direction.
"A key priority for us is to fight illicit drugs, particularly the transnational organizations that are behind the drug smuggling. Here at home, we have put in place tough new laws to crack down on these groups, to put drug dealers behind bars where they belong."
Critics of the so-called 'war on drugs' approach note that Latin American drug cartels have grown more powerful as violence spreads throughout the region — claiming more than 50,000 lives in Mexico alone — and that drug use has only increased in rich nations such as Canada and the United States.
Suddenly, some leaders are looking to this weekend's summit in Cartagena, Colombia as a perfect opportunity to begin debate on a question that was once taboo: Why not remove the profits of the cartels by making the drug trade a legal — but highly regulated — business?
That's not an option being welcomed either by the Harper government, or by U.S. President Barack Obama's administration.
The Obama administration says it is open to a debate on the issue — if only to "demystify" decriminalization as an option and show that such a move would backfire and make matters worse.
Among those speaking most bluntly for decriminalization is Guatemala's president Otto Perez Molina, who was the former head of his country's intelligence service.
In an opinion article that appeared earlier this week in the British newspaper the Guardian, he outlined the merits of ending prohibition.
"We all agree that drugs are bad for our health and that therefore we have to concentrate on impeding their consumption, just as we combat alcoholism and tobacco addiction," he wrote.
"However, nobody in the world has ever suggested eradicating sugarcane plantations, or potatoes and barley production, in spite of these being raw materials in the production of the likes of rum, beer and vodka. And we all know that alcoholism and tobacco addiction cause thousands of deaths every year all over the world."
Molina added that "mainstream global drug policy today is based on a false premise: that the global drug markets can be eradicated."
Guatemala is pushing for countries to drop "ideological" considerations and explore a "realistic approach."
"Drug consumption, production and trafficking should be subject to global regulations, which means that drug consumption and production should be legalized, but within certain limits and conditions," he wrote.
Molina said a regulatory approach to recreational drug consumption would still face problems, such as how to "diminish" violence generated by drug abuse, strengthen public health systems to help drug addicts and prevent substance abuse — possibly by prohibiting drug sales to minors, banning mass media advertising, and slapping high taxes on drugs.
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, who is hosting this weekend's summit, also hasn't been shy about speaking in favour of new options.
Earlier this month, he told the Washington Post the discussion on drug policy is "not rational" and he wants to see an "open" and "objective" debate.
"If we find that there is a better alternative that will take away the profits from the criminal organizations and that maybe you can address the problem of consumption in a more effective way, then everybody will win."

RTE Act applies to all govt, private schools, rules Supreme Court of India


Private unaided minority institutions get exemption
New Delhi, April 12
The government got a shot in its arm today when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act (2009) and ruled that the law would apply uniformly across India to all government, local bodies and private unaided schools.
By a majority view, a three-judge Bench of Chief Justice SH Kapadia and Justices KS Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar said the Act would apply to all private and minority schools, which get grants from the government. All unaided private schools are also covered under the Act with the exception of unaided private minority schools.
All schools covered by the law will now have to compulsorily reserve in Class I (or nursery at entry level) at least 25 per cent seats of the total strength of that class for children belonging to weaker sections and disadvantaged group in the neighbourhood. Top Delhi institutions, including Sanskriti, Modern School, DPS, Vasant Valley would be covered under the RTE Act.
However, missionary schools in Chandigarh like St John’s, Carmel Convent, St Anne’s and Sacred Heart which get no grants from the government, will be exempted and not have to reserve 25 per cent seats for the weaker sections.
“Missionary schools are in any case enrolling children from the Economically Weaker Sections but with the additional 25 per cent quota, they were feeling extremely burdened. The SC order is a relief,” said Alka Sarin, advocate for Chandigarh’s missionary schools.
The SC’s order came on a bunch of petitions filed by private unaided institutions which argued that the law violated their rights under Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution which provided them the autonomy to run institutions without government interference.
Justice Radhakrishnan’s dissenting view that the law should not apply to unaided private and unaided minority institutions was overruled by Justices Kapadia and Swatanter Kumar.
The apex court said the law should be viewed as child-centric and not institution-centric. The court also ruled that the judgment would apply from today (Thursday). This means it won’t apply to admissions granted before today and post April 1, 2010 when the Act came into force. The law will thus apply prospectively.
Earlier, the SC had reserved its judgment on August 3, 2011, on petitions filed by the Society for Unaided Private Schools, Independent Schools Federation of India and others who primarily contested 25 per cent quota at entry level.
HRD Minister Kapil Sibal today thanked the apex court for upholding the interests of children before anything else. “The court has clarified a very complex issue. We welcome the court’s view that such legislations should be seen as child-specific and not institution- specific. It’s the future of children that will be secured through the law. We had always held what the SC has today ruled. Every school must now comply,” he added.
The government, however, clarified that madrassas and Vedic schools won’t be covered under the RTE Act and a Bill amending the law would be taken up in Parliament soon to exempt these institutions. “These institutions are not schools as per the definitions of the RTE Act,” Sibal said.
Schools reserving 25 pc seats will be reimbursed expenditure to the extent of per-child-expenditure incurred by the state as a whole or the actual amount charged from the child whichever is less.

Anand Marriage Act gets Cabinet approval

Sikhs will be able to register marriages under 1909 Act 
New Delhi, April 12
Sikh couples will soon be able to get their marriages registered under the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, instead of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Accepting the long-standing demand of Sikhs, the Cabinet today approved amendments to the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, to provide for registration of Sikh marriages. A Bill to this effect would be introduced in Parliament when the Budget Session resumes later this month.
The Cabinet also approved the introduction of a Bill to amend the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to include registration of marriages as well. The move aims at utilising the existing administrative mechanism to maintain marriage records on the lines of records of births and deaths.
The amendment would allow couples to get their marriages registered independent of their religion, though the option of getting marriages registered under the Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriages Act would continue.
Though the Law Ministry note in respect of this amendment talked of compulsory registration of marriages, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal clarified, “Those who wish can get their marriage registered under this new law. The issue of mandatory registration will be discussed when the Bill reaches the Standing Committee .”
After Parliament passes the amendment Bill, Sikh marriage certificates won’t be issued under Section 2 of the Hindu Marriage Act (as is the case now). The Cabinet decision comes a year after the government decided to drop the proposal of amending the Anand Marriage Act and Salman Khurshid informed the Rajya Sabha of the decision.
The Tribune was the first to report the move on August 29, 2011, following which the Sikhs began fresh agitations for a demand that had once been approved by the Standing Committee on Law when Veerappa Moily was the Law Minister. But later the move fell flat.
Khurshid recently proposed religion-neutral registration of all marriages — a move which the Sikhs slammed. Former Chairperson of the National Minority Commission Tarlochan Singh wrote a protest letter to Law Minister Salman Khurshid, demanding amendment to the Anand Marriage Act and not a religion-neutral marriage registration law.
“This is the victory of Sikhs; we had fought for this right for decades,” Tarlochan Singh said today. Akali Dal’s Rajya Sabha member Naresh Gujral also welcomed the decision saying. “It’s sad that Sikhs who sacrificed so much for the country had to feel alienated over such a small demand. We thank the PM and the Cabinet as this decision reassures minorities that their interests are protected. We want to congratulate Tarlochan Singh, former MP, who spearheaded the campaign in Parliament.”
In the Cabinet, Information Minister Ambika Soni proposed that the amendment Bill be titled Anand Karaj Amendment Bill, 2012. This title is likely to be retained. So far, marriages amongst Sikhs, Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and other communities, except Muslims, Christians, Parsis and Jews, were covered under the Hindu Marriage Act.


Major step in recognizing Sikh identity
JALANDHAR: Not only has a long pending demand of the Sikh community, of recognizing their own marriage ceremony, been fulfilled with Union Cabinet's nod to Anand Marriage Act, but it has also come as a major step in addressing the issue of their search for an independent identity - which gained momentum some three decades back. 

Even as the Sikhs had their own marriage ceremony, initiated by third Sikh master Guru Amar Dass, and is centered around their holy book Guru Granth Sahib, but their marriages were registered under Hindu Marriage Act. Apart from the issue of identity, this had also been creating problems for NRI Sikhs - who are estimated to be around five million across the globe. 

"In our papers, we state our religion as Sikh but when our sons or daughters marry, they get the marriage certificate from the authority under Hindu Marriage Act. Members of our community have been facing problems due to this and would be at loss to explain this paradox even as the Sikhs don't consider themselves as part of Hindus," said Gurdarshan Singh Basra a UK-based NRI whose son recently married in Punjab. As Sikhs sought amendment in Article 25-B of the constitution - which clubs Sikhs, Jains and Budhists with Hindus - which was also a major demand of Dharm Yudh Morcha launched by Akali Dal and the demand epitomized by P S Badal tearing and burning this article in Delhi in early eighties. The demand for Anand Amarriage Act gained momentum in 2006, when Supreme court mandated registration of all marriages. The Sikhs' representative body, SGPC opposed registration under Hindu marriage Actand demanded that Anand Marriage Act be put in place. The clergy and Sikh groups then raised the demand for a separate marriage Act, after refusing to be clubbed under the Hindu Marriage Act. 

Before that National Commission for Minorities Chairman Tarlochan Singh had started pushing papers in union government in 2003 but things would not move beyond a point. "Nod for Anand Marriage Act is meeting their rightful demand and is a major step in recognizing their independent religious identity which was ordained by the Guru himself. It is heartening that it is coming on the eve of Baisakhi when 10th Sikh master Gur Gobind Singh gave final shape to the formation of Khalsa Panth- an independent religious entity," said former IAS officer and prominent Sikh intellectual Gurtej Singh who had also contributed to the authoring of Anand Marriage Act passed by Pakistan. 

GLADA recently razed 5 out of 114 unauthorised colonies


Ludhiana, April 11
Colonisers and developers have joined hands to seek their political masters’ support, with the Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority (GLADA) intensifying its crackdown on unauthorised colonies on the periphery of the city after the expiry of one-month notice period.
Upset over demolition of internal development works in five out of 114 unauthorised colonies, which were put on a month’s notice by GLADA on March 1 earlier this week, the Ludhiana Property Dealers’ and Colonisers’ Association has raised a hue and cry that the regulatory action was against what the ruling SAD-BJP coalition had promised in its election manifesto.
Besides taking up the matter with the state government at an appropriate level, the colonisers said they would submit a memorandum to the chief administrator of GLADA tomorrow for seeking an immediate halt to the demolition drive.
If the proliferation of unauthorised colonies in and around the city and total failure of the developers of such colonies to go for compounding on payment of stipulated licence fee and external development charges (EDCs) on the basis of total area of the colony as per the policy formulated by the government for this purpose is any indication, it is easy to gauge that the unscrupulous colonisers and property developers want the regulatory body to close its eyes towards their unlawful activities and give them a free hand to loot the gullible buyers by passing off plots in unlicensed colonies without making adequate provisions for internal and external development and basic amenities.
That the developers of unlicenced (and unauthorised) colonies, especially those who have some connections with the ruling alliance, have chosen to seek shelter under the wings of politicians is also not strange since it is no secret that most of the unauthorised colonies are developed under the patronage of politicians. “It is a matter of record that politicians of all hues put pressure on us as and when we launch a drive against unauthorised colonies or carry out demolitions,” confided an official of the field staff of GLADA.
Additional Chief Administrator of GLADA Jaswant Singh said regulatory actions being taken against unlicenced developer was strictly as per the policy of the government and laid down standard procedures. “Our brief is very clear, we have to implement the policies of the government in letter and spirit and action initiated to check unplanned and unregulated growth will continue in a relentless manner.”

Corruption intolerable, says Sessions Judge


Interaction with lawyers at Bar room

Ludhiana, April 11
Corruption in the judicial system will not be tolerated at any level. If anyone is found to have indulged in it, strict action will be taken.
This was stated by Sessions Judge Gobinder Singh during interaction with lawyers at the Bar room at the district court complex here today.
He said the menace had been eating into the system and the common man was the worst sufferer. He appealed to lawyers to extend full co-operation in eradicating the evil.
He further said instructions had been issued to all judicial officers to respect members of the District Bar Association.
He sought the co-operation of Bar members in not seeking long adjournments so that the disposal of a large number of pending cases was speeded up.
Association president Jagmohan Singh Warraich put forth sentiments of lawyers. He stressed the need to respect Bar members when they appeared in court.
He said junior lawyers should be encouraged. He added that the judicial system could work more efficiently if relations between the Bench and the Bar were cordial.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

India drags US to WTO on visa fee hike


 

New Delhi: India has dragged the US to the WTO challenging the visa fee hike which discriminates against the Indian software companies sending professionals to the US on short-term contracts.

"Yes, we have sought consultations with the US on the issue," a senior Commerce Ministry official said.

As per the procedure of the World Trade Organisation, consultation is the first stage of a complaint launched in the global trade body.

The US had raised visa fee in 2010 to fund its enhanced costs on its securing its border with Mexico under the Border Security Act. India has been protesting against the measure and raising its concern for the last 18 months.

The law substantially increased the fees for H1B and L1 categories of visas for applicants which employ more than 50 persons in the US or have more than 50 per cent their employees admitted on non-immigrant visas (the 50:50 rule).

Before India's complaint goes to the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the Geneva-based WTO, the parties to the dispute are required to engage into bilateral consultations. The process takes about two months.

"The date and place (of these consultations) have not been finalised," the official said adding the US measure is violating of the WTO rules.

Some of the top Indian companies - TCS, Infosys, Wipro and Mahindra Satyam - were affected by the US action on visa fee. The US is the largest market for the Indian software exports. 

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

ਅਪਰਾਧਿਕ ਮਾਮਲਿਆਂ ਵਾਲੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਰਤਾਨੀਆ 'ਚੋਂ ਕੱਢਣ ਲਈ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ 'ਚ ਸੋਧ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ-ਥਰੀਸਾ ਮੇਅ

ਲੰਡਨ,9 ਅਪ੍ਰੈਲ - ਬਰਤਾਨੀਆ ਦੀ ਗ੍ਰਹਿ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਥਰੀਸਾ ਮੇਅ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਅਧਿਕਾਰਾਂ ਦੇ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੀ ਦੁਰਵਰਤੋਂ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਲੇ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀ ਅਪਰਾਧੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਦੇਸ਼ 'ਚੋਂ ਕੱਢਣ ਲਈ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ 'ਚ ਸੋਧ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਸਕੀਮ ਬਣਾਈ ਜਾ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਬਾਰੇ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਥਰੀਸਾ ਮੇਅ ਨੇ ਮੀਡੀਆ ਨੂੰ ਦੱਸਿਆ ਕਿ ਸਖ਼ਤ ਇਮੀਗ੍ਰੇਸ਼ਨ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਗਰਮੀਆਂ 'ਚ ਆ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ। ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਜੱਜਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਦਿਸ਼ਾ ਨਿਰਦੇਸ਼ ਜਾਰੀ ਹੋਣਗੇ। ਇਮੀਗ੍ਰੇਸ਼ਨ 'ਚ ਸਖਤੀ ਕਰਨ ਦੇ ਬਹੁਤ ਸਾਰੇ ਕਾਰਨ ਹਨ, ਸਿਰਫ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਲਈ ਹੀ ਇਹ ਚਿੰਤਾ ਦਾ ਵਿਸ਼ਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ, ਬਲਕਿ ਬਹੁਤ ਸਾਰੇ ਆਮ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਅੰਦਰ ਵੀ ਡਰ ਹੈ। ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਗਰਮੀਆ 'ਚ ਅਸੀਂ ਨਵੇਂ ਨਿਯਮ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਆਵਾਂਗੇ ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਉਮੀਦ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੀ ਗਲਤ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਹੋਣੀ ਖ਼ਤਮ ਹੋ ਜਾਵੇਗੀ। ਗ੍ਰਹਿ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਈ ਮੇਲ, ਟੈਕਸਟ, ਫੋਨ ਤੇ ਇੰਟਰਨੈੱਟ ਦੀ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਤੇ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਨਿਗ੍ਹਾ ਰੱਖਣ ਦੀ ਸਕੀਮ 'ਤੇ ਵੀ ਆਲੋਚਨਾ ਹੋ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਅਜਿਹਾ ਕਰਨ ਨਾਲ ਆਮ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਅਜ਼ਾਦੀ 'ਚ ਸਿੱਧਾ ਦਖ਼ਲ ਹੈ। ਇਮੀਗ੍ਰੇਸ਼ਨ ਮਸਲਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਮਾਹਿਰ ਵਕੀਲ ਹਰਜਾਪ ਸਿੰਘ ਭੰਗਲ ਨੇ ਇਸ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਸਕਾਈ ਟੀ ਵੀ 'ਤੇ ਵਿਸ਼ੇਸ਼ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਣਾਏ ਜ਼ਰੂਰ ਹਨ, ਪਰ ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਖ਼ਤੀ ਨਾਲ ਲਾਗੂ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ।

ਭਾਰਤ ਤੋਂ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ 'ਚ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਅਦਾਇਗੀ ਬੈਂਕਾਂ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਨਾ ਹੋਣ ਦੇ ਮਾਮਲੇ 'ਤੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਕਰਾਂਗੇ-ਡਾ. ਲੀਚ

ਕੈਲਗਰੀ, 10 ਅਪ੍ਰੈਲ - ਇੰਡੀਅਨ ਐਕਸ ਸਰਵਿਸਮੈਨ ਇੰਮੀਗ੍ਰਾਂਸ ਐਸੋਸੀਏਸ਼ਨ ਕੈਲਗਰੀ ਦੇ ਦਫਤਰ ਵਿਖੇ ਪਾਰਲੀਮਾਨੀ ਸਕੱਤਰ ਡਾ. ਕੈਲੀ ਲੀਚ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਹਿਊਮਨ ਰੀਸੋਰਸਿਸ ਤੇ ਸਕਿਲ ਡਿਪਲੋਮਿਟ ਤੇ ਲੇਬਰ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਭਾਰਤ ਤੋਂ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ 'ਚ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਅਦਾਇਗੀ ਬੈਂਕਾਂ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਨਾ ਹੋਣ ਦਾ ਮਾਮਲੇ 'ਤੇ ਵੀ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਕਰੇਗੀ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਰਾਹਤ ਮਿਲ ਸਕੇਗੀ ਇਸ ਬਾਰੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਵਟਾਂਦਰਾ ਵੀ ਜਲਦੀ ਕਰਨਗੇ। ਡਾ. ਲੀਚ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀ ਸੀਨੀਅਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ 4 ਹਜ਼ਾਰ ਡਾਲਰ ਦੀ ਆਮਦਨ ਤੱਕ ਰਿਆਇਤ ਦੇਣ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਸਰਵਿਸ ਮਨਿਸਟਰ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਨਾਲ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਕਰਕੇ ਥੋੜੇ ਦਿਨਾਂ 'ਚ ਹੀ ਇਸ ਮੁੱਦੇ 'ਤੇ ਅਮਲ ਯਕੀਨੀ ਬਣਾਇਆ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ। ਇਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਦਵਿੰਦਰ ਸ਼ੋਰੀ ਸੰਸਦ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਪੈਨਸ਼ਨਾਂ ਤੇ ਟੈਕਸ ਦਾ ਮਾਮਲਾ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਸਮੇਂ 'ਚ ਭਾਰਤ ਤੇ ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਸਰਕਾਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਵੇਲੇ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਹੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਸੰਭਾਵਨਾ ਪ੍ਰਗਟਾਈ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਅੰਤਰਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਵਪਾਰ ਸਮਝੌਤਾ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਦਾ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਹੋਣ ਦੇ ਨਾਤੇ ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਮਾਮਲਿਆ ਦੇ ਹੱਲ ਲਈ ਯਤਨ ਕਰਦਾ ਰਹਾਂਗਾ। ਅਖੀਰ 'ਚ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਬਜ਼ੁਰਗਾਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਸਮੱਸਿਆਵਾਂ ਦੇ ਹੱਲ ਲਈ ਪੁਰਜ਼ੋਰ ਸਿਫਾਰਸ਼ ਕੀਤੀ। ਇਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਸ. ਫੁੱਮਣ ਸਿੰਘ ਵੈਦ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ, ਸ. ਹਰਗੁਰਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਮਿਨਹਾਸ, ਡਾ. ਮਹਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ, ਬਿਕਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੰਧੂ, ਹਰਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਰਾਏ, ਪ੍ਰੋ. ਮਨਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਿੱਧੂ ਤੇ ਹੋਰਨਾਂ ਨੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਪੇਸ਼ ਕੀਤੇ। ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਬੁਲਾਰਿਆਂ ਨੇ ਆਪਣੀਆਂ ਮੰਗਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਦੁੱਖ ਤਕਲੀਫਾਂ ਵੀ ਪਾਰਟੀਮਾਨੀ ਸਕੱਤਕ ਡਾ. ਕੈਲੀ ਲਾਚ ਤੇ ਐਡਵੋਕੇਟ ਦਵਿੰਦਰ ਸ਼ੋਰੀ ਸੰਸਦ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਦੇ ਧਿਆਨ 'ਚ ਲਿਆਂਦੀਆਂ। ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਹੱਲ ਲੱਭਣ ਲਈ ਦੋਵੇਂ ਮਹਿਮਾਨਾਂ ਨੇ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਦਿਵਾਇਆ। ਇਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਸੇਵਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਪ੍ਰੇਮੀ, ਜੋਗਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਬੈਂਸ, ਸਤਪਾਲ ਕੌਂਸਲ, ਗੁਰਬਖਸ਼ ਸਿੰਘ ਧਨੋਆ, ਪ੍ਰੀਤਮ ਸਿੰਘ ਕਾਹਲੋਂ, ਮੋਹਣ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਿੱਧੂ ਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਹਾਜ਼ਰ ਸਨ।

Thursday, March 22, 2012

NRI CHILDREN CUSTODY ROW


Norway won’t hand over Indian kids

Oslo, March 22
Dealing a blow to an Indian couple battling for custody of their children, Norway's Child Welfare Service has said the kids cannot go back to India, where they can be caught up in "a very unfortunate tug of war" in the wake of differences between their parents.

"New developments in the child welfare case involving two Indian children make it impossible to carry out the hearing in Stavanger District Court that was scheduled for Friday 23 March," the Norwegian Child Welfare Service (CWS) said in a statement.

The statement follows reports of differences between the parents - Anurup and Sagarika Bhhtacharya, whose children three-year-old Abhigyan and one-year-old Aishwarya were placed in foster care in Norway in May last year on grounds of "emotional disconnect".

Norwegian authorities believe that it would not be in the "best interests" of the kids that they be moved to India now amidst differences between the parents.

Over the past few days, both the parents and the children's uncle, who was to get the custody of the kids, "have changed their position several times on the agreement that had originally been reached. This has caused the Child Welfare Service to doubt their motives as far as the agreement is concerned," CWS chief Gunnar Toreseen said. 

Arunabhash Bhattacharya, the paternal uncle of the children, is in Norway in connection with the case. 

The CWS had a clear intention to sign and implement the agreement but that the events of the last few days now make this impossible, Toresen said. 

In view of the "new developments," the hearing scheduled for tomorrow in the Stavanger District Court will not take place now, the statement said. 

Toresen said the authorities have been made aware of a conflict in the family that could influence the outcome of the case. 

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

SC rejects govt plea for Vodafone case review


Srinagar/Jammu, March 20
At least one person was killed and 17 injured as a cyclonic windstorm swept across the Valley, blowing away hundreds of rooftops, uprooting an even greater number of trees, and disrupting power services on Tuesday.
“The minimum temperature has gone 12°C above normal due to steep pressure gradient over the Valley, causing a wind storm that resulted in damage to property,” Aamir Ali, Coordinator, Disaster Management Cell, Kashmir Division, said. The cyclonic windstorm began yesterday afternoon. The winds touched a maximum speed of 40 knots, with average speed being 24.7 knots, he added.
Mohammed Maqbool Magray was killed when a branch of a “chinar” tree fell on him in Kachnambal village in Ganderbal district. Many tourists had to be evacuated to safety from Dal Lake, officials said. They were accommodated in various hotels by the QRT of the State Disaster Response Force (SDRF) led by Dy SP Ghulam Haider and SDPO Nehru park Ghulam Jeelani.
At Pahalgam, a tree fell on a tourist hut, causing injuries to a tourist from Kolkata, Sanjay Paul. He was rescued and provided treatment at the SDH, Pahalgam, officials said.
At least 17 persons were injured in various incidents. Twenty-nine residential houses were fully damaged while 2,166 non-residential, six government buildings and 10 houseboats were partially damaged.
There are reports of extensive damage to the power supply network across the valley. The work is in progress to make the network fully functional. All commercial flights to and fro Srinagar were, however, operating normally, though with slight delays.
There is also a report of an avalanche in the Badwan area of Bandipore district. Two persons were killed, two injured and one has gone missing in the incident.
Around 200 houses were damaged in Poonch, Ramban and Doda districts of Jammu division due to the dust storm. The storm also caused huge damage to private and government property. Several trees were uprooted and the power network hit. However, no loss of life has been reported from the Jammu region so far.
Assistant Commissioner Revenue, Ramban, Ghanshyam Singh Thakur said 42 private houses, five schools, two shops and a temple had been reportedly damaged in the overnight gale. 

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਗ਼ੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਚਿਤਾਵਨੀ


ਰੋਮ (ਇਟਲੀ), 14 ਮਾਰਚ-ਫਰਾਂਸ ਦੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਨਿਕਲਿਸ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਨੇ ਸਮੁੱਚੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਧਮਕੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਜੇਕਰ ਗ਼ੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ ਨਾ ਰੋਕਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਤਾਂ ਉਹ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਨੂੰ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਦੇ ਵੀਜ਼ਾ ਫਰੀ ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਤੋਂ ਅਲੱਗ ਕਰ ਲੈਣਗੇ। ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਦੇ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਬਹੁਤੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਅਤੇ ਸਵਿਟਜ਼ਰਲੈਂਡ, ਨਾਰਵੇ ਤੇ ਆਇਸਲੈਂਡ ਵਰਗੇ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਦੇ ਨਾਗਰਿਕਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਮਾਮੂਲੀ ਜਿਹੇ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਚੈਕਿੰਗ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਯਾਤਰਾ ਦੀ ਸੁਵਿਧਾ ਮਿਲ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ। ਯਾਦ ਰਹੇ ਜੇ ਇੰਜ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਫਿਰ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਵਿਚ ਜਾਣ ਲਈ ਵੀਜ਼ਾ ਲੈਣਾ ਪਿਆ ਕਰੇਗਾ। ਜਦ ਕਿ ਹੁਣ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਵਸਦੇ ਬਹੁਤੇ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਵੀਜ਼ੇ ਤੋਂ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਸੰਘ ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਆਉਂਦੇ 27 ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਰੋਕ-ਟੋਕ ਦੇ ਜਾਣ-ਆਉਣ ਦੀ ਆਜ਼ਾਦੀ ਹੈ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਉੱਤਰੀ ਪੈਰਿਸ ਵਿਖੇ ਇਕ ਵਿਸ਼ਾਲ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਕ ਰੈਲੀ ਨੂੰ ਸੰਬੋਧਨ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਉਪਰੋਕਤ ਬਿਆਨ ਵਿਚ ਇਹ ਗੱਲ ਕਹੀ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਇਕ ਨਵੇਂ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਕੰਟਰੋਲ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਜੇਕਰ ਆਉਂਦੇ ਵਰ੍ਹੇ ਇਸ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਗੱਲ ਨਾ ਹੋਈ ਤਾਂ ਉਹ ਇਸ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਨੂੰ ਤੋੜ ਕੇ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਨੂੰ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਹਰ ਕਰ ਲੈਣਗੇ। ਪਰਵਾਸ ਦਾ ਮੁੱਦਾ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਦੀ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਕ ਮੁਹਿੰਮ ਦਾ ਇਕ ਅਹਿਮ ਮਸਲਾ ਬਣਦਾ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀਆਂ ਕਾਰਨ ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਏਕਤਾ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਿਤ ਹੋ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਉਹ ਹੋਰ ਵਧੇਰੇ ਆਵਾਸ, ਨੌਕਰੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਸਿੱਖਿਆ ਮੁਹੱਈਆ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਵਾ ਸਕਦੇ। ਅਜਿਹਾ ਪਹਿਲੀ ਵਾਰੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਸ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਦੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਨੇ ਅਵਾਜ਼ ਉਠਾਈ ਹੈ। ਇਟਲੀ ਵੱਲੋਂ 5 ਅਪ੍ਰੈਲ 2011 ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਇਥੇ ਆਏ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਉੱਤਰੀ ਅਫਰੀਕਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਕੱਚਾ ਅਵਾਸ ਪਰਮਿਟ ਦੇਣ ਤੋਂ ਵੀ ਫਰਾਂਸ ਖਫਾ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਇਸ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਉਹ ਯੂਰਪੀ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਫਰੀ ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਖੇਤਰ ਵਿਚ ਸਫਰ ਕਰ ਸਕਣਗੇ।
ਇਟਲੀ ਦੇ ਸਾਬਕਾ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਸਿਲਵੀਓ ਬੈਰਲਿਸਕੋਨੀ ਤੇ ਨਿਕਲੋਸ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਇਕ ਸਾਂਝੇ ਪੱਤਰ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਸ਼ੈਨੇਗਨ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਵਿਚ ਸੋਧਾਂ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਗ਼ੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ ਦਾ ਵਹਾਅ ਰੋਕਣ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਯੂਰਪੀਅਨ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਸੰਘ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਕਰ ਚੁੱਕੇ ਹਨ। ਸ੍ਰੀ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਨੇ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ 5 ਸਾਲਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸ 18000 ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਸਾਲ ਤੋਂ ਘਟਾ ਕੇ 10000 ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਸਾਲ ਕਰਨ ਬਾਰੇ ਵੀ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਫਰਾਂਸ ਦੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਸਰਕੋਜੀ ਦੇ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀ ਮੂਲ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਆਏ ਅਜਿਹੇ ਬਿਆਨ ਦੇ ਮੱਦੇਨਜ਼ਰ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਦੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਵਿਚ ਹੋਰ ਅਜਿਹੇ ਬਿਆਨ ਆਉਣੇ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਹਨ, ਜਿਸ ਦੇ ਮਾੜੇ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵ ਆਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਦਿਨਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਦੇਖੇ ਜਾਣਗੇ। ਅੱਜ ਇਟਾਲੀਅਨ ਮੀਡੀਆ ਵਿਚ ਇਸ ਵਿਸ਼ੇ 'ਤੇ ਚੱਲੇ ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਪ੍ਰੋਗਰਾਮਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਚਰਚਾ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਰਹੀ।

Vegreville lawyer named as Alberta farmers’ advocate


EDMONTON - The Alberta government has named Peter Dobbie, a Vegreville lawyer with rural experience, as its new farmers’ advocate.
Dobbie, who starts the job April 2, worked for more than 20 years as a lawyer advising farmers and agribusinesses on business and legal matters.
The Farmers’ Advocate Office assists rural residents with consumer protection, rural opportunities, fair process, managing land assets and interaction with the energy industry.
Dobbie replaces Jim Kiss, who left the post last year after being appointed in 2004.

Alberta Court of Appeal sides with McCauley Community League in fight over apartment building


Alberta provincial court
Alberta Provincial Court
EDMONTON - An Edmonton community league should have been given the right to appeal the construction of a 42-unit apartment intended to house people with chronic addictions, Alberta’s Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.
The written decision seems to throw into question the future of Ambrose Place, which is nearly 75 per cent complete.
Court of Appeal Justice Frans Slatter rebuked the city for failing to notify the McCauley Community League and other neighbours of the property in the first place.
“It is worth noting how unhelpful it was for the development officer not to give notice of this development permit to the appellant and other interested parties” Slatter wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel.
“It was well known that this was a controversial development that was opposed by some people. The failure to give notice created great uncertainty on this file.”
The McCauley Community League filed the appeal against the city, the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board and Niginan Housing Ventures, which is building Ambrose Place at 96th Street and 106th Avenue. The sides presented their arguments Feb. 29.
Tuesday’s ruling showed the case is a tangle of complicated issues.
Because the development officer did not believe the complex to be a special use requiring rezoning — there was a proposed medical component for addiction treatment in the building — rules requiring the city to alert the community of the project and their right to object, were never triggered.
Another critical issue is whether the development permit for Ambrose Place, issued in May 2008, was valid. Typically, builders have one year to start construction on a project. If construction does not start, the permit expires and the developer has to apply for a new permit.
In Tuesday’s ruling, the court agreed that the development permit expired in May 2009, one year after it was issued.
Construction on Ambrose Place did not start, however, until the fall of 2010. The ruling indicates no new development permit was issued. Despite that, the project received a permit from the city in December 2010 to pour a foundation and construction continued through 2011.
The community league tried to plead its case to the Subdivision and Development Appeal board in January 2011, but that quasi-judicial board that helps govern land use matters in the city decided the league was too late to appeal.
On Tuesday, McCauley Community League president Rob Stack described the situation as a “big mess.” The community objected to the proposal in part because they do not believe it complies with the neighbourhood plan and also because they believe McCauley is targeted too often to be the site of social service programs.
Stack said was bizarre and frustrating that construction was allowed to proceed while its future was being considered in court.
“Part of me would like to see this thing ripped out, bulldozed and taken to the ground,” Stack said. “Obviously, it’s been built with millions of dollars in public money and it’s already there. I think we probably need to work with the funders and come up with something that the community will accept and create a viable use for this that will truly enhance the neighbourhood and all the real stakeholders in the area can be happy with.”
Jeremy Taitinger, a lawyer with the firm representing Niginan Housing Ventures, said Tuesday they are reviewing the decision and considering its impact. “We continue to be of the view that this is a good project, it’s good for the city and the community,” he said.
A spokesman for the city said the planning department would not comment on the ruling. Likewise, Gary Dyck, a spokesman with the city’s corporate communications branch, said the city’s Subdivision and Development Appeals Board could not comment on this particular case.
But Coun. Jane Batty, who represents the McCauley neighbourhood on council, said she was happy to learn the community league won its case.
“They have about 45 or 50 social agencies in place, and one of the challenges for them is they don’t want to add more social agencies into the community,” Batty said.
“Without a doubt, the city needs to have a facility like (Ambrose Place), but not in the community of McCauley.”